Legal Corner Q & A
By Various Authors
Q. Recently, the city began to charge landlords a portion of the Rent Board fee. What were the basic changes?
A. Last month, the Rent Board
reduced its fee from $27 to $26 per unit. The fee is
billed to you along with your property tax. Of this
new amount, you may charge $21.50 to the tenant in possession
as of November 1, so that you are responsible only for
$4.50 per unit. The amount charged to the tenant should
be deducted from the interest to be paid on the tenant’s
security deposit each year, and any balance remaining
may be billed to the tenant. Now you are also entitled
to “bank” the Rent Board fee and collect
it in later years. This rule applies for fees imposed
from November 1999 forward. Until recently, the fee
was $16 per year, 100 percent of which could be passed
on to the tenant. Last year, the fee was $27, but only
$21.50 could have been passed through to the tenant
or “banked.”
– Michael C. Hall
Q. We recently rented a flat to a Section 8 family. The fed pays $1,750 and the tenant pays $500. The tenant recently failed to pay his/her portion of the rent. What should we do?
A. In most instances, Section 8 pays all the rent, so the landlord is never faced with a nonpayment of rent situation. In this case, the tenant and the government each contribute towards the rent. Landlords must understand that the Section 8 contract with the government is distinct and separate from the relationship between the tenant and the landlord. According to their contract with the government, Section 8 landlords must satisfy various requirements pertaining to the condition of the rental unit and the treatment of their tenants.
In this case, the landlord should pursue the same course of action that would be invoked absent a Section 8 contract. Specifically, the landlord should serve a Three-Day Notice to Pay Rent or Quit for the tenant’s portion of the rent. However, the following special rules apply. First, the landlord must give the Section 8 administrators notice of the eviction in writing. At a minimum, a copy of the eviction notice along with a letter of explanation should be sent to the local Section 8 office (the San Francisco Housing Authority) at or before the time the tenant is served. Landlords have been known to lose evictions because the Section 8 office had not been served. Second, the eviction notice should state that the landlord has complied with all HUD rules governing the termination of the tenancy. Third, the landlord should avoid depositing the Section 8 checks during the eviction proceeding. Technically, the landlord’s acceptance of Section 8 funds will not constitute a waiver of the landlord’s right to proceed against the tenant for failure to pay rent, but acceptance of partial rent may complicate the proceedings. The eviction, if rent remains unpaid, proceeds in the same manner as a non-subsidy action (five-day summons, complaint and possible trial in Superior Court).
There may also be additional requirements depending
on the terms and conditions of the Section 8 contract.
The government has many different housing subsidy programs,
so keep in mind that blanket advice does not apply in
all situations where a tenant’s portion of the
rent is unpaid. Thus, a landlord is strongly advised
to seek competent legal counsel before attempting to
terminate a Section 8
contract.
– David Wasserman
Q. When an owner begins to allow a tenant access to a storage unit and a washer and dryer, can he/she seek a rent increase?
A. The answer is a qualified yes, and the qualifications have more to do with the sequence of events than your right to increase the rent. Hopefully, you have not yet provided the tenant access. If you have allowed the tenant to use these facilities for a sufficient period of time, the tenant may reasonably claim that you have allowed such use without an additional fee and have, therefore, waived the right to collect any additional rent and voluntarily increased the housing services provided under your existing rental agreement What is a sufficient period of time? The tenant’s use has lasted from several weeks to at least two or three months, the use has been open and obvious and you, the landlord, have direct evidence that the tenant is using the facilities.
If you have provided the tenant with access to and use of the storage unit and washer/dryer for a sufficient period of time without an increase in rent, and if you then decide to deny that access, the tenant could reasonably claim that you have decreased his/her housing services and actually could request a rent reduction.
Assuming that you have not yet provided the tenant access to these facilities, you should schedule a meeting with the tenant and offer the additional space/services to the tenant in writing with a corresponding increase in the monthly rent. If the tenant accepts the offer, or you otherwise reach an agreement enabling the tenant to use the storage unit and/or washer/dryer, then draft a new lease or an amendment to your existing lease. This should reflect the terms of your agreement, including the fee or increased rent that the tenant must pay for the increased housing services.
The above analysis assumes that there was no express or implied access to use the storage unit or washer/dryer at the time of the signing of the original lease. An example of express authorization would be a verbal representation by you (or a property manager) to the tenant prior to the execution of the lease, indicating that the tenant had access to these facilities. Implied authorization typically occurs when the tenant utilizes, with the owner’s knowledge, facilities not referenced or within the scope of the lease agreement or in a manner (open and obvious) suggesting that the owner should have known the tenant was using the additional facilities.
In short, if the tenant has expressed a desire to use
the storage unit and washer/dryer, put your agreement
in writing and enjoy your increased rents. If the tenant
already uses the facilities, has done so for only a
few days or weeks, refuses to pay any increased rent
and if you only recently discovered the tenant’s
use of the facilities, you should advise the tenant
in writing that they do not have access nor the right
to use these facilities. If the tenant continues her/his
use, consult an attorney as you probably have a problem
tenant on your hand.
– Kenneth Vierra, Jr.
Q. If a tenant has already signed a lease, and then decides he/she no longer wants the unit and doesn’t move in, is the tenant still legally responsible for rent payments?
A. The first question is whether or not a landlord-tenant relationship was created. This relationship is created by a contract between the parties. It can be called a rental agreement, a lease or a month-to-month agreement, and it may be oral or written. To be enforceable, the contract must show that the parties intend to create a landlord-tenant relationship, and it must: 1) designate the parties, 2) describe the premises, 3) specify the rent to be paid and the time and manner of payment and 4) specify the term for which the tenant will rent the unit. Of course, the exchange of rent, security deposit and receipts solidifies the creation of the relationship. Even though the tenant never took possession of the premises, as long as a true landlord-tenant agreement was created, you may be permitted to collect damages (including rent) from the tenant who announces that she/he does not intend to perform her/his obligations under the agreement, which is to move into the unit.
Once you have determined that a landlord-tenant relationship
was created, you next look at the type of agreement
you
created in order to determine the amount of damages
you can claim from the breaching tenant. If you simply
have a month-to-month agreement, which can be terminated
by a tenant giving 30 days’ written notice of
termination, the damages will likely be cut off after
30 days. Even if the notice is only oral, I would not
suggest taking damages in excess of the 30 days. If
you have created a term lease (for example for a term
of six months or a year) in which the tenant may not
terminate the tenancy prior to the expiration of the
term without cause, you may have a claim for damages
for the entire term of the tenancy. However, you must
always do your best to mitigate your damages by immediately
looking for a new tenant once the original tenant has
breached, otherwise the tenant will have a defense against
your claim for damages. Your costs for locating a replacement
tenant—for example, newspaper ads, and property
management fees—should also be recoverable from
the breaching tenant.
Of course, collecting the money from the departed tenant could prove difficult, unless you are already holding the first month’s rent and/or a security deposit. You could deduct the rent actually lost as a result of the breach from the rent or security deposit held. However, according to Civil Code Section 1950.5, you are required within 21 days of the tenant vacating (in this case, 21 days from the time the tenant gave notice that he/she does not want to move in), to either return the security deposit or provide a written explanation as to any retention of the security deposit.
Should the unit remain vacant for a period beyond the
21 days, despite your best efforts to re-rent it, you
will have to recover those excess rental losses along
with the other non-rent costs you have incurred in a
separate court action against the breaching tenant.
Remember, you can only take a maximum of 30 days’
rent anyway for a month-to-month agreement. For a term
lease, if you are forced to rent the unit for less than
the contract price, the tenant may be responsible for
the difference in rent due for the entire term of the
tenancy (there should be a specific term in the lease
covering this issue). For example, you have a one-year
contract for $2,500 with a tenant who then tells you
she/he is not moving in. You have done your best to
find a new tenant, but given the market, the second
tenant is only willing to pay $2,300. The first tenant
is then liable for $200 per month for a year ($2,400).
Assuming you re-rent the unit prior to the 21-day deposit
return period, you may be able to include the rental
difference in your explanation and retention of the
deposit. Otherwise, it will have to be the subject of
a separate court action for damages. To be certain that
you are taking the proper course of action, you should
always consult an attorney prior to retaining any monies
paid by a tenant who never takes possession of the unit.
– James M. Millar and Sally Morin
The opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily re?ect the viewpoint of the SFAA or the San Francisco Apartment Magazine. Theinformation contained in this article is general in nature.Consult the adviceofanattorneyforanyspecificproblem. Michael C. Hall can be reached at 415-512-9865. David Wasserman is with Wasserman & Taxman, 415-567-9600. Kenneth Vierra, Jr. is with Lynch, Gilardi & Grummer, 415-397-2800. James M. Millar and Sally Morin can be reached at 415-981-8100. Copyright © 2003.




